Heinze ArchitektenAWARD 2019: Sieger "Nachwuchsarbeiten"

Architekturobjekte

Heinze ArchitektenAWARD 2019: Sieger "Nachwuchsarbeiten"


buy back berlin

Diese Objektpräsentation wurde angelegt von: Universität der Künste Berlin, Architektur, Tobias List

Diese Objektpräsentation wurde angelegt von: Universität der Künste Berlin, Architektur, Tobias List

Basisdaten zum Objekt

Lage des Objektes

Deutschland

Objektkategorie

Objektart

Art der Baumaßnahme

Entwurfskonzept

Verwendete Produkte

bisher

noch keine

Gebäudedaten

Tragwerkskonstruktion

Holz

Anzahl der Vollgeschosse

11- bis 20-geschossig

Raummaße und Flächen

Bruttogrundfläche

41.072 m²

 

Verkehrsfläche

6.127 m²

 

Wohnfläche

24.055 m²

 

Grundstücksgröße

6.385 m²

Beschreibung

Objektbeschreibung

While we were searching for a topic for our BA thesis we were deeply influenced by the current Wohnungsfrage discussion and especially by the #Mietenwahnsinn demonstration in the beginning of April. As an initial point for our project we tried to condense all these influences and researches regarding Berlin-specific housing policies in a prologue with the title Housing as Social Infrastructure.




We don’t need another shopping mall!

Our research was mainly focused on the district of Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg and especially on the area around Warschauer Straße. For us this area with its obsolete railway plots, industrial inner city sites and various one-storey relics of socialist East Berlin hold great spatial potentials. We hope to save this area from further land speculation and profit-driven developments, that have happened on the Anschutz-Areal around Mercedes-Benz Arena, located just on the other site of the train tracks.




Quite soon we were coming to the conclusion that Berlin needs more socially dedicated housing and for us this means affordable housing in the long term. We believe cooperatives are one plausible answer to the housing question, because their social interests are more important than their commercial interests. We propose the city should work closer together with cooperatives and other socially dedicated communities, buy back inner city plots and let them under a leasehold contract. These cooperatives could develop and curate their buildings while the city stays the owner of the land.




In our project we tried to imagine how such a cooperatively run building should be spatially articulated, for which we defined a certain architectural grammar. With the terms Affordability, Contexture, Communality, Self-regulation, Paradise and Open City we tried to set a textual diagram to frame our design process.  

Beschreibung der Besonderheiten

The programme we developed in the end includes a market, a public swimming pool, a cinema, a Kita, a social care center, a multifunctional space, a Volx kitchen and several common spaces like a laundry, gardening and a repair workshop, which are all part of the fixed programme. All other indoor spaces are defined as rental units (open programme) which offer the freedom to be inhabited for living, working and production or anything else. All these different uses are superposed and linked by a generous outdoor circulation out of streets, ramps and access balconies. This open circulation system plus rooftops, terraces and balconies offer many possibilities to encounter with neighbours, clients, guests etc. and blurs the borders between living and working, private and public.

Schlagworte

Housing, Wohnungsbau, Public, Mixed-use, Hybrid, Holzbau, Wood, Student, Berlin, Wohnungsfrage

Energetische Kennwerte

Energetische Kennwerte

Primärenergie

Fernwärme

 

Sekundärenergie

Holz

Objektdetails

Gebäudespezifische Merkmale

Anzahl Wohneinheiten

224

Bitte melden Sie sich an

Um diese Funktion nutzen zu können, müssen Sie bei heinze.de registriert und angemeldet sein.

Hier anmelden

Diese Seite weiterempfehlen

1043332938